Tag Archives: Ken Hugessen

Page 1 of 212

After the AGM: a compensation committee reset?

With the heavy lifting over for another year, the next few months serve as an opportune time to review mandates and renew committee relationships
By Ken Hugessen
With Erin Poeta
May 19th, 2017

The annual general meeting represents a time of change for boards, as long-serving directors step down and new individuals join on. This time of renewal may also suggest a need for boards and committees to reflect on their mandates. For … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized, Views | Tagged , , , ,

One-time awards: use sparingly

A well-designed compensation framework should negate the need for most one-time awards. Where exceptions arise, they must be handled with care
By Ken Hugessen
With Christine Vinette and Brian Lees
December 19th, 2016

One-time compensation awards can be a useful tool for boards to attract and retain key talent. While such awards have drawn considerable scrutiny of late, shareholders and proxy advisers are not always opposed to their use. This article explores how … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , ,

Defusing share buyback anxiety

Investors are watching closely to see how companies deploy their cash, wary of schemes that inflate executive pay. But it needn’t be stressful, as long as boards get a few things right
By Ken Hugessen
With Michelle Tan and John Skinner
October 11th, 2016

The challenges of prioritizing long-term value creation over short-term returns has intensified in recent years and now impacts a wide range of topics, including executive compensation. The significant increase in share buyback activity in the U.S. (US$166 billion in the … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , , , , , ,

Setting pay through strategic transitions

Establishing performance standards and setting and managing executive pay is never easy. But what happens in a period of structural change? How do boards measure a moving target?
By Ken Hugessen
With Guillaume Poulin and Erin Poeta
August 1st, 2016

Over the last few years, many traditional business models have been threatened by obsolescence, including, to name a few, travel agencies, print media and more recently, coal-fired power plants. Boards and management teams in such sectors are often faced with … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , ,

In vogue for 2016? Pay cuts

Their share prices have been falling for years. Now more mining boards, having signed off on cuts to everything else, are wondering if it’s time executive pay followed suit
By Paul Brent
March 4th, 2016

Mining companies are accustomed to working with long lead times: potential plays can take years to assess, mines can take a decade to develop and operate for decades more while commodity cycles rise and fall. This year, as those companies’ … Continue reading

Posted in Handbook, Top Stories | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Options anxiety allayed…for now

New rule on tax deductibility won’t be retroactive
By Listed staff
December 15th, 2015

The sighs of relief were heard all over. In late November, a month after the federal election, Liberal Minister of Finance Bill Morneau put to rest a near panic in public company circles when he announced that changes in the … Continue reading

Posted in Handbook | Tagged , , , ,

Long-term compensation alternatives

Stock options are out of favour and the best-known alternatives aren’t really long-term at all. When it comes to executive pay, what’s a long-term oriented board to do? Try these ideas on for size
By Ken Hugessen
With Bridget McKellar
October 11th, 2015

Corporate boards and management teams of public issuers often bemoan the challenge of making effective long-term strategic business decisions in the face of short-term pressure from financial markets and investors to deliver quarterly results. Recently, however, there has been growing … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , ,

All quiet? Keep it that way

Say-on-pay support was up this year and proxy advisers had fewer beefs. Rather than be complacent, boards should build on this goodwill by stepping up shareholder communications and engagement
By Ken Hugessen
With Michelle Tan
July 29th, 2015

Anyone reading the headlines during the 2015 proxy season might think recent efforts to reform executive compensation in Canada have suddenly fallen off the rails with this year’s multiple say-on-pay failures. But judging by shareholder votes, we see that the … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , , , , ,

Total return not the total view

Total Shareholder Return has a nice ring to it. And much to recommend it as a tool to guide CEO pay decisions. But boards that use it exclusively aren’t getting a complete picture
By Ken Hugessen
With Linda McNally
May 16th, 2015

In recent years, Total Shareholder Return (TSR) has become the most frequently used metric in long-term incentive plans for assessing company relative performance and guiding the outcome of pay decisions. It is also used by proxy advisory firms to evaluate … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , , , ,

Make long-term value your guide

When executive operational performance and market returns are out of sync, what’s a compensation committee to do? Check and recheck the pay-for-performance rationale and share it with shareholders
By Ken Hugessen
With Lisa Oldridge
February 27th, 2015

As with all commodity players, mining companies are largely price takers, subject to price swings reflecting global macroeconomics, geopolitical forces and changes in underlying supply and demand over which management have no control. Moreover, absolute share-price performance among the miners … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , , ,

Money talks, excessive pay walks

SPECIAL REPORT: PREPARING FOR PROXY SEASON | An effective proxy season strategy takes in many elements. But these days, nothing within the board’s oversight is more critical to the process, and to AGM voting itself, than executive compensation
By John Greenwood
December 17th, 2014

One of the distinguishing traits of a good board of directors is they try to be prepared, so they’re always looking ahead, craning their necks to figure out what’s coming around the next bend. Back in 2010 the board at … Continue reading

Posted in Features, Top Stories | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Own the pay-for-performance narrative

A board’s best defence in the say-on-pay era? Conduct an independent pay-for-performance assessment, then communicate it to your shareholders
By Ken Hugessen
With Lisa Oldridge
October 30th, 2014

Shareholders are interested in ensuring compensation is aligned with performance, and they use say-on-pay votes and director elections to express concerns where this is not seen to be the case. Unfortunately, many issuers fail to provide compelling evidence of a … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , , ,

Shareholder proposals reflect evolving concerns

The frequency of shareholder proposals and their levels of support are gradually gaining steam in Canada. Directors are wise to pay heed. If your board isn’t a target today, it might be tomorrow
By Ken Hugessen
With Michelle Tan
August 27th, 2014

Directors and executives are increasingly aware of the trend towards increasing engagement with shareholders. It runs the spectrum from relatively civilized dialogue behind closed doors to fractious proxy contests. Somewhere in between is a third form of engagement: shareholder proposals. … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , , ,

Make room, and make ready

Directors need to acknowledge the increasingly active role of shareholders and their advisers in executive compensation decision making—and then engage shareholders directly to hold sway over the agenda
By Ken Hugessen
April 21st, 2014

Today, it would be hard for a director of a mid-size or large public issuer to miss the increasing involvement of shareholders and proxy advisers (e.g. ISS and Glass Lewis) when dealing with executive and director pay and related performance … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , , , ,

No value in empty gestures

Income disparity is one of our society’s most serious challenges. But measures like the CEO pay-ratio rule recently approved by the SEC aren’t needed and won’t do anything to address the problem
By Ken Hugessen
With Allison Lockett
December 13th, 2013

The SEC in the U.S. recently announced that it is moving ahead with the CEO pay-ratio rule contained in the Dodd-Frank bill. That rule requires public companies to calculate and disclose the ratio of the CEO’s pay to that of … Continue reading

Posted in Views | Tagged , , , ,
Page 1 of 212